Skip to main content


Setting and streaming in schools

By Kate Hilpern

Ok, so you knew your daughter was unlikely to be in the top set for maths. But the bottom set seems a bit harsh.

Does it matter? It’s a question parents all over the country will be pondering as their offspring are put in their sets ready for the academic year ahead.

First things first, I should hold my hands up and admit I have mixed views about the very concept of setting. While politicians, Ofsted and many schools are all for grouping students according to academic ability, a growing body of academic research suggests it’s actually not effective in raising achievement among all students and that it can even damage the prospects of the children most in need of an educational improvement.

It’s not as if setting is a given. It went out of favour in the 1960s, when mixed-ability made a comeback, but in the 1980s it was back, with bells on – and by the early 1990s, more than four in five secondary schools used sets for at least two subjects, and three out of five for at least four subjects. Now, even extreme-setting – known as streaming – is popular in some schools. Here, students are grouped according to their overall ability across all subjects.

The problem with streaming is obvious – to me, anyway. What if a child has different ability levels in different subjects (as most of us do)? How can you possibly move up a stream? What about kids’ self-esteem? As for setting, multiple studies show that while small achievement gains may be made by top achieving students, the impact of those in lower groups is negative. In other words, lower-ability students who are put in streams or sets can have poorer outcomes. And even though setting has been shown to work well for some gifted students, studies show that’s only the case if they’re taught a special enriched curriculum.

Moreover, only this month, research found that black students are two-and-a-half times more likely than white pupils to be wrongly placed in lower ability sets for maths. Secondary schools should consider reducing the use of setting and streaming as there are ‘risks’ with the practice, according to researchers from UCL Institute of Education and Queen’s University Belfast.

No wonder many heads and teachers admit they’d do away with sets, given half a chance. Some have made the bold move to ditch it altogether and are reaping the rewards. ‘Watching children work alongside higher-achieving peers can be a great motivator – we see previously disinterested children coming on leaps and bounds thanks to being inspired by their classmates,’ one headteacher told us. Interestingly, schools that haven’t, but want to, get rid of sets are mainly deterred what parents will think, according to academics. It would, say these academics, be viewed as ‘unconventional’ by parents, who would consequently avoid the school as a result.

As for the impact of your child being in the wrong set right now, the answer is yes, it matters. Bearing in mind what we know the studies have found, it’s clear that being in the wrong set can be a de-motivator and, in year 9 upwards, sets determine which GCSE levels your child studies for.

That said, it’s important to remember that most schools put children into sets based on multiple factors, including background information from previous schools if relevant. They think long and hard about who should be in which set, rather than making any rash decisions.

But sometimes schools do get it wrong. If your child finds the work too easy, gets bored and races through homework, that’s a good sign you have a point. Your child’s work should be a challenge – although not so much that they really struggle.

So what can you do? It depends on the school. Some only move students up at the end of a school year and even then they might have a policy to only move one or two of the kids at the top and ditto with the bottom ones down from each set; others have more flexibility.

Ultimately, be led by your child. Some kids actually prefer to be at the top of a lower set; others will be as desperate as you to be moved up so they can be more challenged. And remember not to let your negativity rub off on them. If you’re still unhappy, talk it through with the teacher – either at parents’ evening, or if you can’t wait, beforehand. But listen to their reasons as much as you expect them to hear yours. And deal with the facts, rather than being led by your emotion.

I’d like to see more schools consider whether setting really is the best way of helping all children reach their potential. And as we know that parent power counts in this area, this could be your chance to make a difference. So if you are unsatisfied with how your school’s sets have worked out for your family, here’s a plea from me - consider using it a starting point to mentally address the system itself...



No comments received for Setting and streaming in schools

Please login to post a comment.

Most popular Good Schools Guide articles

  • Moving the desks won’t make the results better

    Bernadette John, our Director of Special Educational Needs, despairs at yet another pointless idea from The Department of Education. The school admissions system is, apparently, now taking the blame for the lack of social mobility which is blighting opportunities and depriving the nation of much-needed talent.

  • About the number one UK trusted school guide.

    The Good Schools Guide is the UK’s number one school guide, helping parents in every aspect of choosing the best education for their children. Trusted by parents for over 30 years, the guide includes unbiased and candid school reviews and in-depth articles on education-related issues. It is available in print, online to subscribers or through GSG’s expert consultants. Uniquely, each school is selected on merit alone. No one can buy their way into the GSG’s good books. And from famous names to local treasures, their writers visit every single school, interview the head, speak to pupils and parents, analyse academic…

  • For 'Grammar Schools' read 'Fee-Paying Schools'

    One criticism of grammar schools is that they take a disproportionate number of children from privileged backgrounds. A far smaller number of grammar school pupils receive the pupil premium than pupils in comprehensive schools.

  • Sad stories of wasted opportunities for children in need

    Buttle UK is a charity which supports disadvantaged children. One of its more imaginative and bolder initiatives has been to fund places at boarding schools for children who are thought likely to benefit from the opportunities this would provide. The project has been sensitively designed so as not to create divisions between children and their own families and social milieu.

  • Time and places

    The initial furore over National Offer Day is over - although, of course, the next one - Primary School Offer Day - is only six weeks away and we'll have to go through the whole miserable experience again. We, at The Good Schools Guide, along with everyone else, get worked up on behalf of children who are not allocated their first choice school or, far more worrying, children who get offered none of their six choices. It isn't good enough and shouldn't be happening.

Subscribe for instant access to in-depth reviews:

30,000 Independent, state and special schools in our parent-friendly interactive directory
 Instant access to in-depth UK school reviews
 Honest, opinionated and fearless independent reviews of over 1,000 schools
 Independent tutor company reviews

Try before you buy - The Charter School Southwark

The Good Schools Guide subscription

GSG Blog >

The Good Schools Guide newsletter

The Good Schools Guide Newsletter

Educational insight in your inbox. Sign up for our popular newsletters.

The Good Schools Guide manifesto for parents