In order to get a placement for their child at an independent mainstream school funded by a local authority (LA), parents have to get an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP).
Only then, if parents can prove that the school in question can meet their child’s needs - and that it would not be ‘unreasonable public expenditure’ - will the LA agree to name and pay for that school on the child or young person’s EHCP.
Sometimes, the LA’s choice of named school (usually a local maintained/state school) can also arguably meet the child’s or young person’s educational needs adequately and more cheaply, so parents then fail to get the LA to pay for the school or the special educational provision required.
Parents can still be successful though. Whilst there is no getting around the fact that there is an increased expense of annual fees for independent schools, parents sometimes successfully persuade an LA to come to a contributory funding arrangement with them, whereby, for example, the LA agrees to pay for the additional SEN provision that they would have had to provide in their preferred maintained mainstream school, on the basis that the parents will then agree to pay for the school fees and transport costs at their preferred independent mainstream school.
This kind of agreement can also be reached before or during an appeal to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal.
Whilst Tribunal panels cannot order contributory funding arrangements, sometimes, agreements are only reached during the course of an appeal (especially when a Tribunal hearing is looming).
Arguments are also often more successful when parents can evidence that they have already tried to make their child’s placement at a maintained mainstream school work, but this has not happened, even with additional support, despite ability and potential. Some other things which parents successfully argue are:
Sometimes LAs tell parents that it is unlawful for them to make contributory funding agreements, especially now we have moved to a new SEN framework with EHC plans.
However, there is nothing in the Children and Families Act 2014 or the new SEN Code of Practice (CoP) 2015 which prevents an LA from reaching a contributory funding arrangement with parents.
In fact, the CoP actually makes reference to such arrangements being possible!
The CoP even states that, if the LA is not satisfied that the parents’ alternative arrangements are suitable (for example, if increased specialist support is needed to be brought in for the child, such as weekly occupational therapy sessions), then the LA can ‘choose to assist the child’s parent or the young person in making their arrangements suitable, including through a financial contribution’ (although they are under no obligation to do so).
Another way parents can achieve similar results to a contributory funding arrangement, might be for them to request that any quantifiable support in an EHC plan is set out as a Personal Budget (PB) by the LA. PBs are where the LA equates the provision in a child’s EHC plan to a sum of money. PBs are only available under EHCPs.
Parents can request (though the LA are not obligated to provide) Direct Payments, where the LA provides the money for their child’s support directly to the parents and they are then responsible/free to choose and source the support. Whilst parents cannot spend this on school fees, they could fund the school fees privately and then use the Direct Payments to fund specialist support (eg speech and language or occupational therapy) for their child.
This would then effectively achieve a similar result as a contributory funding arrangement, without having actually reached one with the LA.
With thanks to Douglas Silas, director, and Suzannah Lindon-Morris, a SEN specialist, at Douglas Silas Solicitors.
What do you want for your child? State school or fee-paying? Day or boarding school? Single sex or co-education? It helps to have a game plan, even if you change it at a later date. What do you want from the school? Undoubtedly you want to find a great school, one that's ideal for your child, with great teaching and possibly good facilities to match.
Left scratching your head about the difference between public school, private school and independent school? And where on earth prep schools and boarding schools fit into the picture? Fear not – our at a glance guide will set you straight: Independent Schools further reading
While state schools are prohibited from interviewing any but potential sixth form students, the interview is an integral part of nearly every private school admissions process, and tends to send the applicant’s parents, rather than the actual applicant, into a spin. Parents feel considerably more responsible for their child’s social presentation than for his or her ability to do long division or conjugate French verbs.
The 11+ is the entrance exam procedure for getting your brightish little button into a fee-paying or state grammar school. Much of the country abolished the 11+ several decades ago for state schools, but a few local authorities, such as Bucks and Kent, retained a large number of grammar schools and run county-wide entrance tests. In some other areas, such as Barnet and Kingston, a few grammar schools exist in tandem with the comprehensive system found in most of the country. These grammar schools set their own entrance exams. Sixth Form
As their name suggests, the main aim of ‘preparatory schools’, or prep schools, is to prepare children for entry to fee-paying senior schools at 11 or 13. Traditionally, pre-preps take children from 3 or 4 and prepare them for moving on to preps at 7 or 8. There are fewer stand-alone pre-preps than there used to be as their main market, the boarding prep, has declined in numbers.